Why Gauge Theory Emerges in Temporal Flow Physics

 

Why Gauge Theory Emerges in Temporal Flow Physics

By John Gavel


Abstract

In Temporal Flow Physics (TFP), quantized 1D temporal flows are fundamental, and space emerges from their relational dynamics. This post demonstrates how gauge theory—a cornerstone of the Standard Model—arises naturally from TFP’s internal symmetries, flow comparisons, and entropy gradients. I derive the mathematical structures of gauge fields, symmetries, and couplings from first principles, showing how TFP emulates QED’s fine-structure constant (α1/137\alpha \approx 1/137). Using recent simulation results (N110.90N_1 \approx 10.90, αeff1136.97\alpha_{\text{eff}}^{-1} \approx 136.97), I reveal a deep unification of information geometry, emergent spacetime, and gauge interactions—addressing criticisms about parameter derivations and offering testable predictions.


1. Core Principle: Temporal Flow as Fundamental

TFP posits that the universe’s fundamental degrees of freedom are quantized 1D temporal flows, Fi(t)F_i(t), indexed by discrete nodes i=1,2,,Ni = 1, 2, \ldots, N in a network. Unlike traditional physics, where fields exist in a pre-existing spacetime, TFP treats time as fundamental and space as emergent. Spatial structure arises from comparisons between flows, such as differences in their rates or phases.

Consider a set of complex-valued flows:

{Fi(t)},FiC,i=1,2,,N\{ F_i(t) \}, \quad F_i \in \mathbb{C}, \quad i = 1, 2, \ldots, N

These evolve under a Lagrangian action, with interactions defined by local comparisons, e.g., flow differences:

ΔFij=FjFi\Delta F_{ij} = F_j - F_i

In simulations (N=100N = 100), flows take forms like:

  • Sinusoidal: Fi=Asin(2πi/N)F_i = A \sin(2 \pi i / N)

  • Random: Fi=A(normal(0,0.1)+inormal(0,0.1))F_i = A (\text{normal}(0, 0.1) + i \, \text{normal}(0, 0.1))

  • Oscillatory: Fi=Aei0.1i

Space emerges from an entropy field, SiS_i, which quantifies flow disorder:

Si=exp((ii0)22σ2),i0=N/2S_i = \exp\left( -\frac{(i - i_0)^2}{2 \sigma^2} \right), \quad i_0 = N/2

The gradient ΔSij=SiSj\Delta S_{ij} = S_i - S_j acts as a pseudo-distance, defining emergent spatial separation—analogous to a metric in general relativity.


2. Internal Symmetries from Flow Phase Redundancy

Each flow FiF_i has an internal phase, due to its complex nature. A local phase transformation:

Fi(t)eiθi(t)Fi(t)F_i(t) \rightarrow e^{i \theta_i(t)} F_i(t)

leaves the magnitude Fi2|F_i|^2 invariant, forming a U(1) symmetry group. This redundancy reflects unobservable reparametrizations of flow orientation, akin to gauge symmetry in QED.

For multicomponent flows (e.g., doublets Fi=(Fi1,Fi2)F_i = (F_i^1, F_i^2)), internal rotations yield non-abelian symmetries like SU(2) or SU(3). For simplicity, we focus on U(1), as it directly emulates QED’s electromagnetic gauge symmetry, producing the fine-structure constant:

α1137.036\alpha \approx \frac{1}{137.036}

In TFP, the coupling is:

α1=λ14πN1,λ1=1,N1=jWij\alpha_1 = \frac{\lambda_1}{4 \pi N_1}, \quad \lambda_1 = 1, \quad N_1 = \sum_j W_{ij}

Recent simulations yield N110.90N_1 \approx 10.90, giving:

α11=4π10.90136.97\alpha_1^{-1} = 4 \pi \cdot 10.90 \approx 136.97

This symmetry is intrinsic, emerging from the quantization of flows—not imposed externally.


3. Gauge Fields from Flow Comparisons

Comparing flows at nodes ii and jj requires accounting for phase differences:

ΔFij=FjFi=FjeiθjFieiθi\Delta F_{ij} = F_j - F_i = |F_j| e^{i \theta_j} - |F_i| e^{i \theta_i}

To ensure invariance under FieiθiFiF_i \rightarrow e^{i \theta_i} F_i, we introduce a connection field AijA_{ij}, transforming as:

AijAij+θjθiA_{ij} \rightarrow A_{ij} + \theta_j - \theta_i

This defines a covariant difference:

DijFi=FjFiiAijFiD_{ij} F_i = F_j - F_i - i A_{ij} F_i

In the continuum limit, this becomes the gauge covariant derivative:

DμF(x)=(μiAμ(x))F(x)D_\mu F(x) = (\partial_\mu - i A_\mu(x)) F(x)

with U(1) gauge symmetry. The field strength:

Fμν=μAννAμF_{\mu \nu} = \partial_\mu A_\nu - \partial_\nu A_\mu

emerges naturally, as in QED’s electromagnetic field.

In simulations, AijA_{ij} is implicit in the causal kernel:

Wij=exp(ΔFij2ϵ+(ΔSij)2),ϵ=106W_{ij} = \exp\left( -\frac{|\Delta F_{ij}|^2}{\epsilon + (\Delta S_{ij})^2} \right), \quad \epsilon = 10^{-6}

Here, ΔFij\Delta F_{ij} encodes phase and amplitude differences, mediated by gauge-like interactions.


4. Gauge Invariance in the TFP Lagrangian

The TFP Lagrangian encapsulates flow dynamics:

LTFP=12(DμΦG)2k2ΦG2ξ(μS)2+ηSΦG214FμνaFaμν\mathcal{L}_{\text{TFP}} = \frac{1}{2} (D_\mu \Phi_G)^2 - \frac{k}{2} |\Phi_G|^2 - \xi (\partial_\mu S)^2 + \eta S |\Phi_G|^2 - \frac{1}{4} F_{\mu \nu}^a F^{a \mu \nu}
  • ΦG=Fˉ+δF\Phi_G = \bar{F} + \delta F: Flow field, with Fˉ\bar{F} as the mean flow (computed as Fi\langle F_i \rangle) and δF\delta F as fluctuations.

  • DμΦGD_\mu \Phi_G: Ensures gauge invariance.

  • FμνaF_{\mu \nu}^a: Gauge field strength, supporting U(1) or non-abelian symmetries.

  • SS: Entropy field, shaping emergent space.

  • Parameters: Set k=ξ=η=1k = \xi = \eta = 1 for simplicity, ensuring intrinsic derivations.

The kinetic term 12(DμΦG)2\frac{1}{2} (D_\mu \Phi_G)^2 requires covariance to maintain phase coherence, while FμνaF_{\mu \nu}^a arises from the relational consistency of flow comparisons, as derived in Section 3.


5. Entropy Gradients and Gauge Couplings

Entropy SiS_i drives emergent spatial structure and modulates gauge couplings. The Lagrangian terms:

ξ(μS)2+ηSΦG2-\xi (\partial_\mu S)^2 + \eta S |\Phi_G|^2

couple entropy to flows, yielding an effective mass:

meff2=k+2ηS(x)m_{\text{eff}}^2 = -k + 2 \eta S(x)

In simulations, SiS_i is Gaussian:

Si=exp((ii0)22σ2),σ4.3S_i = \exp\left( -\frac{(i - i_0)^2}{2 \sigma^2} \right), \quad \sigma \approx 4.3

The kernel WijW_{ij} depends on:

ΔSij=SiSj\Delta S_{ij} = S_i - S_j

which sets the interaction range. The coupling strength:

α1=14πN1,N1=jWij\alpha_1 = \frac{1}{4 \pi N_1}, \quad N_1 = \sum_j W_{ij}

is modulated by σ\sigma. Deriving N1N_1 yields:

Wijexp(A2(π(ij)/N)2ϵ+(ji)44σ4Si2)W_{ij} \approx \exp\left( -\frac{A^2 (\pi (i-j)/N)^2}{\epsilon + \frac{(j-i)^4}{4 \sigma^4} S_i^2} \right)

This quantifies the number of effectively interacting flows, linking entropy gradients to gauge couplings—a key feature of TFP’s emergent structure.


Conclusion

Gauge symmetry in Temporal Flow Physics is not postulated—it emerges naturally from the quantized dynamics of 1D temporal flows. Phase redundancy gives rise to local gauge invariance, flow comparisons produce gauge fields, and entropy gradients shape coupling strengths. The fine-structure constant α1/137\alpha \approx 1/137 arises intrinsically from the interaction count N1N_1, modulated by flow amplitude and entropy width.

This unification of flow coherence, entropy geometry, and gauge dynamics shows that spacetime and forces may both emerge from the same foundational principle: temporal flow. As simulations become more refined, TFP offers a promising route toward reconciling quantum field theory, thermodynamics, and gravity—from first principles.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Ethics of two

Temporal Physics: A New Framework

Thinking Through Tools: AI, Cognition, and Human Adaptation