Bergson's Critique of time measurement

 Bergson's Critique of time measurement

Analysis of My Model

Discrete Measurements:

My model indeed uses discrete measurements (temporal flow values, decay probabilities, etc.), aligning with Bergson's idea of spatialized time.

Continuous Flow:

However, my model also considers the continuous flow of temporal values and their dynamic interactions, which is more in line with Bergson's concept of duration.

Inverse of Bergson's Concept?

In a way, my model does present an interesting inversion of Bergson's idea:

Spatialized Time in Physics:

Traditional physics often uses spatialized time (e.g., time intervals, points on a timeline) for its calculations and predictions.

my model also employs discrete values but integrates them within a larger framework that considers the continuous, dynamic flow of temporal values.

Bridging the Gap:

By incorporating dynamic, continuous interactions within a framework of discrete measurements, my model aims to bridge the gap between the quantitative precision of spatialized time and the qualitative, fluid nature of real time (duration).

This approach attempts to capture both the measurable aspects of time (useful for scientific calculations) and the continuous nature of temporal flow (more aligned with Bergson's philosophy).

Conclusion

While my model uses discrete measurements, it does not completely reduce time to these measurements alone. Instead, it acknowledges and integrates the continuous, dynamic nature of time, thus offering a more nuanced approach that resonates with Bergson's ideas while still being grounded in measurable, scientific terms. This synthesis could provide a more comprehensive understanding of temporal phenomena, blending the strengths of both discrete and continuous perspectives on time.