Relational Boundary
By John Gavel
Ok, some of my work is now pointing toward the resolution of boundaries. This is always a stick point isn't it? I've stated a conjecture on paradox and incompleteness and solved it using my TFP theory and assembly theory.. Consider a law..
The Relational Boundary Law
1. Every system has an operational boundary — the limit of where it can generate part‑level relational context. This boundary is identical to its resolution depth (or temporal resolution in flow form).
2. Inside this boundary lies workable truth. Truth is the coherence that emerges from competent operation within this bounded context, not from any view from nowhere.
3. At the boundary, three distinct signatures appear:
Friction: quantitative mismatch where structure is preserved but values drift.
Paradox: qualitative mismatch — information the system cannot resolve at its current depth; its core assumptions fail.
Collapse: structural breakdown — the system’s predictions contradict the environment or each other.
4. Beyond the boundary, signals fall into two classes:
Signal still arriving: potentially resolvable if resolution deepens or boundaries shift.
Signal that will never couple: permanently incompatible structures; no amount of time or pressure yields stable coherence.
5. Two systems can coordinate only where their operational boundaries overlap. This overlap — resolution compatibility — determines whether coupling is genuine, frictional, paradoxical, or impossible. Shared origin matters only insofar as it still shapes their present boundaries (living history).
6. Relational distance modulates timing, not possibility. Greater distance delays coupling and amplifies pressure, but only resolution compatibility decides whether coherence can ever stabilize.
7. Growth is boundary expansion; individuation is boundary divergence. Some paradoxes dissolve when resolution deepens; others reveal permanent incompatibility. In all cases, incompleteness is invariant — boundaries never vanish, they only move.
8. No system can step outside all boundaries. Every system, at every scale, inherits contextual incompleteness. There is no universal truth or universal ethics — only:
truth as coherence within boundaries, and
ethics as how boundaries meet, overlap, and refuse each other.
1. Systems, worlds, and boundaries
World:
$$ W \neq \emptyset $$
System: a pair
$$ S = (X_S,\; O_S) $$
where \( X_S \subseteq W \) is the domain it can address, and \( O_S \) is its set of operations (inference rules, update rules, etc.).
Operational boundary:
$$ B(S) \subseteq W $$
the region where \( S \) can generate stable, part-level relational context.
Resolution depth:
$$ r(S) \in \mathbb{R}^+, $$
with
$$ B(S) = \{\, w \in W : \rho_S(w) \le r(S) \,\} $$
for some “difficulty” or “complexity” function
$$ \rho_S : W \to \mathbb{R}^+. $$
(E.g. assembly depth, proof depth, flow gradient, curvature, etc.)
2. Truth and coherence
Coherence of system \( S \) at world-point \( w \):
$$ C_S(w) \in [0,1] $$
where \( C_S(w) \) measures how well \( S \)’s predictions/relations match the actual structure at \( w \).
Workable truth region:
$$ T(S) = \{\, w \in W : C_S(w) \ge \tau \,\} $$
for some threshold \( \tau \in (0,1) \).
The law asserts:
$$ T(S) \subseteq B(S) $$
3. Boundary signatures: friction, paradox, collapse
Define error as
$$ E_S(w) = 1 - C_S(w). $$
At points near the boundary (where \( \rho_S(w) \approx r(S) \)), classify:
Coupled:
$$ E_S(w) \le \epsilon_{\text{coupled}} $$
Friction:
$$ \epsilon_{\text{coupled}} < E_S(w) \le \epsilon_{\text{friction}} $$
quantitative drift, structure preserved.
Paradox:
$$ \epsilon_{\text{friction}} < E_S(w) \le \epsilon_{\text{paradox}} $$
qualitative failure of core assumptions (cannot resolve at current depth).
Collapse:
$$ E_S(w) > \epsilon_{\text{paradox}} $$
contradictions / structural breakdown.
with
$$ 0 < \epsilon_{\text{coupled}} < \epsilon_{\text{friction}} < \epsilon_{\text{paradox}} < 1. $$
4. Signals and incompatibility
For a given \( S \), define:
Signal still arriving:
$$ A(S) = \{\, w \notin B(S) : \exists S' \text{ with } r(S') > r(S),\; C_{S'}(w) \ge \tau \,\} $$
Signal that will never couple:
$$ N(S) = \{\, w \notin B(S) : \forall S' \text{ reachable extensions of } S,\; C_{S'}(w) < \tau \,\} $$
5. Coordination between systems
For two systems \( S_1, S_2 \):
Boundary overlap:
$$ B_{12} = B(S_1) \cap B(S_2) $$
Resolution compatibility:
$$ RC(S_1, S_2) = \frac{\mu(B_{12})} {\mu\!\left(B(S_1) \cup B(S_2)\right)} $$
for some measure \( \mu \) on \( W \).
Joint coherence:
$$ C_{12}(w) = \min\{ C_{S_1}(w),\; C_{S_2}(w) \} $$
Relational distance: a metric or cost
$$ D(S_1, S_2) \ge 0 $$
(e.g. path integral of mismatch, flow gradient, etc.) which modulates how fast coherence can be established, not whether it is possible.
6. Growth, individuation, and incompleteness
Growth (boundary expansion):
$$ S \to S' \quad\text{with}\quad r(S') > r(S),\; B(S) \subset B(S') $$
Individuation (boundary divergence):
$$ S_1 \to S_1',\; S_2 \to S_2' $$
with
$$ \mu\!\left(B(S_1') \cap B(S_2')\right) < \mu\!\left(B(S_1) \cap B(S_2)\right) $$
Invariant incompleteness:
For every system \( S \),
$$ \mu(B(S)) < \mu(W) $$
and for any expansion sequence \( (S_n) \),
$$ \sup_n \mu(B(S_n)) < \mu(W) $$
i.e. no system’s boundary ever covers the whole world.
In closing of this blog. I'm ok with how its stated over all. I actually started with three part to the law and found they were related internally so it collapsed the structure of it. I'm on the fence.. still thinking about this.
No comments:
Post a Comment