SECTION 16 — ORIGINATION IN TEMPORAL FLOW PHYSICS (v11.2)
First-Principles Unification from a Single Causal Substrate
By John Gavel
16.0 Overview
All observed phenomena — particles, forces, spacetime, and quantum effects — emerge from the discrete temporal-flow network (Section 1). No additional fields, symmetries, or dimensions are postulated.
Causal hierarchy:
- Microscopic: Binary flows \(F_i \in \{+1, -1\}\) (A2)
- Mesoscopic: Stable motifs via recursion (Sections 4, 13.1)
- Macroscopic: Gauge, gravity, and quantum behavior (Sections 12–15)
- Unification: arises from recursive alignment in emergent 3+1 geometry (A3, Section 3.4.2)
16.1 Node Dynamics as Fundamental Law
Substrate evolves via tension-minimizing update:
\[ F_i(t + \tau_0) = \begin{cases} -F_i(t) & \text{if } \Delta T_i(t) < 0 \\ F_i(t) & \text{otherwise} \end{cases} \]
Stochasticity via Metropolis updates (Section 2.2.1)
Microscopic law complete: all higher-level behavior is emergent
16.2 Cluster Coherence and the 132-Bit Budget
Stable clusters form when synchronization exceeds decoherence. Handshake budget \(H = 132\) (Sections 12.0, 14.3):
\[ C(l)^2 = 1 - \frac{L(l)}{H}, \quad L(l) = \text{spectral lag (Section 15.10)} \]
Explains Top Quark non-binding: \(C(l) \to 0\) when \(L(l) \ge 132\)
16.3 Emergent Gravity and Relativistic Geometry
Gravity and relativistic spacetime structure emerge from conservation and redistribution of causal throughput within the finite 132-handshake substrate. No geometric postulates, metrics, or relativistic symmetries are assumed.
16.3.1 Fundamental Causal Constraint
Each node operates under a fixed handshake budget per substrate tick: \(H = 132\) (Sections 12.0, 14.3)
Define per-axis causal latency:
\(\lambda_x, \lambda_y, \lambda_z\) = processing delays along independent comparison axes (axes defined by minimal self-determining structure; Section 3.4.2)
Define causal throughput:
\(\nu_d = 1 / \lambda_d\)
The substrate enforces conservation of total causal throughput:
\[ \nu_x^2 + \nu_y^2 + \nu_z^2 = \nu_{\text{max}}^2 \quad \text{(Causal Norm Invariant)} \]
This invariant replaces the geometric postulate of constant \(c\) and is the sole kinematic constraint.
16.3.2 Emergence of Time and Proper Duration
Experienced time is the norm of accumulated causal delay:
\[ t = \sqrt{\lambda_x^2 + \lambda_y^2 + \lambda_z^2} \]
At rest (isotropic allocation): \(\lambda_x = \lambda_y = \lambda_z = \lambda_0\)
\(t_0 = \sqrt{3 \lambda_0^2} = H \cdot \tau_0\)
Proper time is thus the magnitude of the latency vector constrained by the handshake budget.
16.3.3 Emergence of Special Relativity
Motion corresponds to anisotropic redistribution of throughput, not spatial displacement.
Define velocity fraction along x:
\[ \frac{v}{c} = \frac{\nu_x}{\nu_{\text{max}}} \]
From the invariant: \(\nu_x^2 + \nu_y^2 + \nu_z^2 = \nu_{\text{max}}^2\)
Solve:
\[ \lambda_x = \gamma \lambda_0, \quad \lambda_y = \lambda_z = \frac{\lambda_0}{\gamma}, \quad \gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}} \]
Then:
\[ t(v) = \sqrt{\lambda_x^2 + \lambda_y^2 + \lambda_z^2} = \gamma t_0, \quad L(v) = \frac{L_0}{\gamma}, \quad m(v) = \gamma m_0 \]
Thus, Lorentz transformations emerge exactly from causal throughput conservation, without spacetime axioms.
16.3.4 Emergent Gravity as Throughput Curvature
Mass corresponds to persistent latency load within a cluster:
\(T(x) = \text{local cumulative latency density}, \quad T \propto M\) (Section 15.2)
Spatial variation in latency redistribution induces curvature in causal flow:
\[ R_{\text{eff}} \approx \frac{\nabla^2 T}{T} \]
This curvature produces gravitational acceleration as a gradient in allowable causal rate.
16.3.5 Recovery of the Einstein Equation
Coarse-graining the causal norm constraint over clusters yields:
\[ G_{\mu\nu} = 8 \pi G_{\text{obs}} T_{\mu\nu}, \quad G_{\text{obs}} = \frac{L_c^3}{M_c \cdot T_c^2} \]
Gravity is therefore classical, emergent, non-quantized, and a manifestation of throughput curvature. No graviton or background spacetime is required.
16.4 Gauge Forces from Holonomy
Gauge fields arise from loop holonomy over multi-path motifs:
\[ H_p = \sum_{\text{edges}} \omega \frac{\tau_v - \tau_u}{L_c} \]
Continuum limit: \(\displaystyle F_{\mu\nu} = \partial_\mu A_\nu - \partial_\nu A_\mu\)
Non-Abelian structure arises from overlapping recursion paths → \(U(1) \times SU(2) \times SU(3)\) (Sections 13.4, 14.2)
16.5 Matter from Icosahedral Symmetry
Fermion masses refined via icosahedral phase volume \(\Omega\) (Sections 12.1, 12.2):
\[ m = f_{\text{substrate}} \cdot \exp[\Omega_{\text{eff}}(d)] \]
Fundamental fermion masses = phase-locked residues of \(K = 12\) lattice
Electron, Muon, Tau directly tied to \(f_{\text{substrate}} \approx 0.217 \text{ GeV}\)
Bosons = collective excitations of phase-synchronized clusters; no fundamental distinction
16.6 Running Couplings and Unification
Couplings evolve with scale due to coherence decay:
\[ \frac{d\alpha}{d \ln l} = 2 \alpha(l) \left[\Gamma_{\text{form}}(l) - \Gamma_{\text{decay}}(l)\right] \]
At \(l^*\) where formation balances decay → \(\alpha_U =\) fixed point
16.7 Quantum–Gravitational Unity
Quantum effects: local phase coherence \(C_\theta\)
Gravity: global amplitude coherence \(C_A\)
Both emerge from the same substrate
16.8 Temporal Asymmetry and CPT
Arrow of time = irreversible coarsening:
\[ S_{\text{coarse}}(t) = -\frac{1}{N} \sum_i T_i(t), \quad \text{monotonic increase} \]
CPT preserved microscopically, appears broken macroscopically due to initial low-entropy clusters. Matter–antimatter asymmetry = early Omega overlap (Section 12.5)
16.9 Revised Axiomatic Closure
Phenomenon | Substrate Origin | Axiom / Limit
- Gravity | Curvature from \(\nabla^2 T / T\) | A3, A6
- Gauge Forces | Loop Holonomy | A2, A3
- \(\alpha^{-1}\) | Surface Sphericity & Folding Tax | H, K, \(\Psi_{\text{sph}}\)
- Matter | 4-path recursive stability | A2, A6, A9
- Top Quark | Budget Saturation | \(L > 132\)
- Neutrino | Spinor Double-Cycle | \(1 / (2 H \cdot H^2)\)
16.10 Bridge to Validation
Single causal substrate → emergent 3+1 geometry
Recursive coherence → running couplings, mass hierarchy
Holonomy groups → Standard Model gauge structure
Irreversible coarsening → arrow of time
16.11 Geometric Saturation and Universal Invariants
Fields and matter dynamics underpinned by saturation of \(K = 12\) adjacency graph
Coupling constants and propagation limits appear where node cluster information capacity reaches equilibrium
16.11.1 Discrete Metric and Substrate Pi (\(\pi_s\))
Circumference: \(\Phi_p = 4\) update steps
Diameter: \(d_s = 2\) adjacency units
Substrate Pi: \(\pi_s = \Phi_p / d_s = 2\)
Continuum \(\pi\) emerges via coarse-graining
16.11.2 Fine Structure Invariant
\[ \alpha^{-1} = (H + K \cdot \phi) \cdot \Psi_{\text{sph}} - (\pi / \phi) \approx 137.036 \]
\(\Psi_{\text{sph}} \approx 0.939\) (icosahedral sphericity, Section 12.2)
16.11.3 Weak Mixing Angle
\[ \sin^2(\theta_W) = 1 / \phi^3 \approx 0.236 \] (Sections 12.4, 14.8)
16.12 Universal Hardware Scorecard
Phenomenon | Substrate Origin | Hardware Derived | Exp. Value
- Higgs Mass | Scalar Node Update | 126.1 GeV | 125.1 GeV
- W Boson | Edge Adjacency | 80.31 GeV | 80.38 GeV
- Z Boson | Vertex Projection | 91.16 GeV | 91.19 GeV
- Proton Mass | Shell-1 Core | 938.27 MeV | 938.27 MeV
No comments:
Post a Comment