How I Think About Objects in My Model
An Electron Is Not a Thing
In my framework, an electron isn’t a little object flying through space.
It is a stable, periodic solution of the binary flow update rule:
\[ F_i(t + T) = F_i(t) \quad \text{for all } i \text{ in a localized motif } M \]
where \( F_i(t) \in \{ -1, +1 \} \) at every substrate site \( i \), and updates follow:
\[ F_i(t + \tau_0) = \begin{cases} -F_i(t) & \text{if } \Delta T_i(t) < 0 \\ \phantom{-}F_i(t) & \text{otherwise} \end{cases} \]
with tension \( T_i = \sum_{j \sim i} |F_i - F_j| \).
So when I say “electron,” I mean:
- A set arcs of nodes \( \{i\} \) in the substrate
- Whose flows oscillate in a self-reinforcing cycle
- Stabilized only because neighboring sites maintain compatible tensions
There is no electron over and above that process.
No substrate → no tension dynamics → no electron.
Asking “where is the electron when it’s not interacting?” is like asking where a whirlpool is when there’s no water. The question assumes an object where there is only a pattern.
Mass Is Not “Stuff” — It’s Resistance to Temporal Change
This is already hidden in standard physics — I’ve just made it explicit.
From the Compton relation:
\[ \lambda_C = \frac{h}{mc}, \quad \tau_C = \frac{h}{mc^2} \quad \Rightarrow \quad m = \frac{h}{c^2 \tau_C} \]
Mass is literally inverse time.
From uncertainty:
\[ \Delta E \Delta t \geq \frac{\hbar}{2}, \quad E = mc^2 \quad \Rightarrow \quad \Delta t \geq \frac{\hbar}{2 m c^2} \]
The heavier the particle, the shorter its minimum timescale.
From Feynman propagators:
\[ G(x,t) \propto \exp\left( i \frac{m c^2 t}{\hbar} \right) \]
Mass sets the frequency of quantum oscillation.
In my model, this becomes ontological:
\[ M \propto \exp\left[ -\pi (\Omega - 1) \right], \quad \tau_p = -\frac{\tau_0}{\ln \beta} \]
Higher mass → lower coherence exponent \( \Omega \) → shorter persistence time \( \tau_p \).
Mass is resistance to temporal evolution.
A Proton Is Not Three Quarks in a Bag
A proton is not a container holding three smaller objects.
It is a volumetric lock — a 3D motif with recursion depth \( d = 5 \), stabilized by geometric closure on a 12-neighbor (icosahedral) shell.
Its mass arises from the coherence exponent:
\[ M_{\text{proton}} = M_c \cdot \exp\left[ -\pi (\Omega_{\text{eff}} - 1) \right] \]
where
\[ \Omega_{\text{eff}} = \Omega_0 + \frac{\gamma}{\xi_{\text{coh}}} - \sum_{\text{paths}} + \Delta\Omega_{\text{conf}} + \Delta\Omega_{\text{int}} \]
and the interaction term \( \Delta\Omega_{\text{int}} = -1/12 \) reflects the 12-fold sharing of tension.
The “quarks” aren’t particles inside the proton.
They are sub-patterns — stable flow channels within the total recursive structure.
Break the geometric closure, and the whole motif dissolves.
Time Is Not Global — It’s Local Update Rate
General relativity already tells us: time dilates near mass.
But it doesn’t say why.
My substrate explains it:
\[ \tau_{\text{eff}} = \frac{\tau_0}{1 - \delta_{\text{geom}}} \]
where \( \delta_{\text{geom}} = 1 - C_0^2 \) is local misalignment.
High disorder → slower effective time → this is gravitational time dilation.
There is no universal clock. Each substrate site updates at its own rate, governed by local tension.
Space itself emerges from temporal correlations:
\[ C_{ij}(\tau) = \langle F_i(t) F_j(t + \tau) \rangle, \quad d_{ij} = -\ln \left( \max_\tau |C_{ij}(\tau)| \right) \]
Space is not primitive — it’s a statistical shadow of causal time.
You Are Not a Collection of Particles
The same logic applies to you.
Your body is a persistent resonance chamber of phase-coherent flows.
It consists of roughly \( 10^{28} \) atoms, each itself a stable motif, organized hierarchically:
- Electrons: \( d = 1 \) oscillations
- Quarks: parts of \( d = 5 \) locks
- Molecules: synchronized clusters
- Cells: nested coherence bundles
Every fundamental time step — \( \tau_0 \approx 3 \times 10^{-25} \) seconds —
every “particle” in your body is recomputed from the substrate.
You are not something that persists unchanged.
You are a pattern that is continuously reconstructed.
Like a fountain: the water molecules change constantly, but the form remains.
Why This Is Not Idealism
The Substrate Is Real
Reality consists of a discrete, underlying temporal substrate:
- Each site \( i \) holds \( F_i(t) \in \{ -1, +1 \} \)
- Adjacency is fixed: \( i \sim j \) defines immediate neighbors
- Updates are causal: no influence propagates faster than \( c = a / \tau_0 \)
This is realism about process, not objects.
Objects Are Real Patterns
Emergence does not mean “unreal.”
- Temperature is emergent from molecular motion — and real
- Countries are emergent from social structure — and causally powerful
- Electrons are emergent from substrate flows — and real
Their reality is relational, not intrinsic.
How the Model Resolves the Standard Paradoxes
1. Quantum Nonlocality
Standard QM says: Alice measures spin-up, Bob instantly “knows” spin-down.
My explanation:
There was never “Alice’s particle” and “Bob’s particle.”
There was one parent cluster that split, with global phase:
\[ \theta_\lambda = \arg\left( \sum_{i \in C} w_i e^{i \phi_i} \right), \quad w_i = e^{-\delta_i} \]
The correlation is:
\[ \langle AB \rangle = -\cos(\theta_a - \theta_b) \quad \text{only if} \quad \Omega \approx 1 \]
where
\[ \Omega = \exp\left( -\frac{\max(L - c T_A, 0) + \max(L - c T_B, 0)}{\ell} \right) \]
No signal travels.
Nothing jumps across space.
It’s one extended causal pattern — like two ends of a rope.
2. Wave–Particle Duality
The electron isn’t switching identities.
It’s one extended motif with coherence length \( L_c = \sqrt{D / \kappa} \).
- At the slits: \( \Delta x \gg L_c \) → wave-like interference
- At the detector: \( \Delta x \ll L_c \) → particle-like localization
Same object. Different scale of observation.
3. The Measurement Problem
Collapse isn’t mysterious.
It occurs when the detector and cluster achieve phase synchronization:
\[ \Gamma_{\text{sync}} = \frac{1}{|A|^2} \sum_{i,j \in A} \alpha(i,j) \cdot T_{i \leftrightarrow j} \geq \Gamma_{\text{crit}} = \frac{\sigma_p}{\bar{C}_A} \]
No observer.
No consciousness.
Just causal alignment completing within the light cone.
The Implication I Take Literally
When I say:
> “You are a persistent resonance chamber of phase-coherent flows”
I mean it literally.
Every \( \tau_0 \sim 10^{-25} \) seconds:
- Every \( F_i \) updates
- Via tension minimization
- The pattern “you” is rebuilt
Destroy the substrate, and “you” don’t go somewhere else.
You never existed independently.
Why This Changes Everything
If objects are patterns, not things:
Identity Is Not Fundamental
You tomorrow are not the same as you today — just structurally similar.
Separability Is Approximate
There are no fundamental “Alice” and “Bob.”
Only regions of substrate.
Entanglement isn’t mysterious — separation is.
Causation Is Geometric
Not “A causes B.”
But: the joint pattern \( A\text{--}B \) evolves under:
\[ \frac{dF_i}{dt} = -\frac{\partial T}{\partial F_i} \]
No extra causal powers required.
Death Is Decoherence
Not a soul leaving a body.
But loss of pattern stability:
\[ \Omega \to 0, \quad \beta = 1 - C_\theta \to 1 \]
The motif dissolves into substrate noise.
My Bottom Line
I’m not proposing:
- A new particle physics model
- A new interpretation of quantum mechanics
I’m proposing a redefinition of what existence means.
Objects, space, time, causation, identity — all emerge from:
\[ F_i(t) \in \{ -1, +1 \}, \quad i \sim j, \quad \Delta T_i \leq 0 \]
This is already encoded in quantum field theory — just obscured by formalism.
The propagator \( G(x-y) \propto 1/(k^2 - m^2) \) says: mass sets correlation decay in time.
My correlation function \( C_{ij}(\tau) \) says the same thing directly.
If this is right, it belongs in the same category as:
- Copernicus: Earth not central
- Darwin: humans not special
- Einstein: time not absolute
TFP: objects are not fundamental.
Reality is a network of causal updates.
“Things” are stable patterns in that updating.
Mass is how hard it is to change those patterns.
No comments:
Post a Comment