htmljava

TFP Section 11 (v9)

SECTION 11 — MEASUREMENT, COLLAPSE, AND EMERGENT TURBULENCE GEOMETRY (v9.2)

Unified Dynamics from Causal Alignment and Misalignment
By John Gavel

11.0 Overview

In Temporal Flow Physics, quantum measurement collapse and classical turbulence emerge from the same substrate dynamics:

  • Microscopic: Stable motifs undergo phase synchronization → measurement collapse (Section 10)
  • Macroscopic: Cluster misalignment damps convection → turbulence dissipation (Section 2.6)

The key controlling scalar is cluster alignment, derived from binary flows \( F_i \in \{+1, -1\} \) (Axiom 2):

\[ C_0^2 = \left\langle \frac{F_i F_j}{|F_i||F_j|} \right\rangle_{\text{local}} = \langle F_i F_j \rangle_{\text{local}} \tag{11.1} \]

since \( |F_i| = 1 \). Its complement defines geometric misalignment:

\[ \delta_{\text{geom}} = 1 - C_0^2 \tag{11.2} \]

This scalar modulates convection, vortex stretching, and effective time (Section 2.6.1).

11.1 Measurement as Causal Synchronization

Measurement is the physical process of aligning a detector’s adjacency graph with an incoming cluster’s flow orientation. From the TFP Causal CHSH Theorem, the “hidden variable” is the global phase of the parent cluster:

\[ \theta_\lambda = \arg\left( \sum_{i \in C} w_i e^{i \phi_i} \right), \quad w_i = e^{-\delta_i} \tag{11.3} \]

where \( \phi_i = \arg(\text{DFT}[F_i(t)]) \) is derived from the binary flow autocorrelation \( R_i(\tau) = \langle F_i(t) F_i(t+\tau) \rangle \) (Section 3.1). The detector’s setting \( \theta_a \) is the physical rotation angle of its local adjacency graph, which defines a preferred axis \( \mathbf{n}(\theta_a) \).

The outcome is the sign of flow alignment:

\[ A = \mathrm{sign}\left( \sum_{i \in \text{det}} \boldsymbol{\alpha}_i \cdot \mathbf{n}(\theta_a) \right) \tag{11.4} \]

where \( \boldsymbol{\alpha}_i \) is the proto-vector (Section 7.1.2). For a coherent cluster, \( \boldsymbol{\alpha}_i \propto (\cos \theta_\lambda, \sin \theta_\lambda) \), so \( A = \mathrm{sign}(\cos(\theta_\lambda - \theta_a)) \).

Measurement collapse occurs when the detector and cluster share sufficient causal overlap \( \Omega \) (TFP Causal CHSH Theorem):

\[ \Omega = \exp\left( -\frac{\max(L - c T_A, 0) + \max(L - c T_B, 0)}{\ell} \right) \tag{11.5} \]

where \( \ell = a_{\text{phys}} \) is the coherence length (Section 5.5). When \( \Omega \approx 1 \), phase synchronization is complete and quantum correlations \( \langle AB \rangle = -\cos(\theta_a - \theta_b) \) emerge. When \( \Omega \approx 0 \), outcomes are classically anti-correlated. This is dynamic phase locking — not instantaneous collapse — and requires no external observer.

11.2 Network Mapping of Quantum Phenomena

All quantum phenomena derive from substrate dynamics:

Phenomenon TFP Mechanism Origin
Superposition Coexisting eigenmodes Section 10.4
Interference Loop correlation sum Section 3.4.2
Entanglement Shared causal history → CHSH correlation \( \langle AB \rangle = -\cos(\Delta\theta) \) Section 11.1
Tunneling Flow over tension barriers Section 2.1.1
Collapse \( \Omega \approx 1 \) → phase synchronization Section 11.1
Uncertainty Finite node capacity Section 10.5
Gauge invariance Loop holonomy \( H_p = 2\pi n \) Section 3.4.2

11.3 Momentum as a Derived Observable

From Section 5.3.2, the physical momentum scale is \( P_c = M_c L_c / T_c \). For a motif \( A \) with centroid velocity \( \mathbf{v}_C \) (Section 4.10):

\[ \mathbf{P}_A = M_A \mathbf{v}_C \tag{11.6} \]

The de Broglie relation emerges from calibration (Section 5):

\[ \lambda = \frac{h_{\text{eff}}}{|\mathbf{P}_A|}, \quad h_{\text{eff}} = L_c P_c = \hbar_c \tag{11.7} \]

11.4 Uncertainty from Capacity Limits

From Section 10.5, finite node capacity implies:

\[ \Delta x \geq L_c, \quad \Delta p \geq P_c \quad \Rightarrow \quad \Delta x \Delta p \geq \hbar_c \tag{11.8} \]

This is a direct consequence of discrete substrate resolution (Section 5.5).

11.5 Temporal Dilation from Misalignment

High misalignment (\( \delta_{\text{geom}} \to 1 \)) slows local dynamics because tension minimization requires more update steps to resolve conflicts (Section 2.1.2). The effective time is:

\[ \tau_{\text{eff}} = \frac{\tau_0}{1 - \delta_{\text{geom}}} \tag{11.9} \]

Thus:

  • \( \delta_{\text{geom}} \to 0 \): \( \tau_{\text{eff}} \approx \tau_0 \) (aligned, fast)
  • \( \delta_{\text{geom}} \to 1 \): \( \tau_{\text{eff}} \to \infty \) (frustrated, slow)

The effective speed is:

\[ c_{\text{eff}} = \frac{L_c}{\tau_{\text{eff}}} = c_{\text{pred}} (1 - \delta_{\text{geom}}) \tag{11.10} \]

where \( c_{\text{pred}} = L_c / \tau_0 \) (Section 5.2.3).

11.6 Turbulence as Emergent Geometry

Turbulence arises from partial misalignment in large-scale clusters.

11.6.1 Field Construction

Coarse-grained velocity (Section 2.3.1):

\[ \mathbf{u}(\mathbf{x},t) = \sum_i F_i(t) W(\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{x}_i) \tag{11.11} \]

Vorticity:

\[ \boldsymbol{\omega} = \nabla \times \mathbf{u} \tag{11.12} \]

High \( C_0^2 \) → laminar flow; low \( C_0^2 \) → turbulent flow.

11.6.2 Geometric Order Parameters

Vortex stretching is modulated by misalignment:

\[ S_{\text{eff}} \propto \delta_{\text{geom}} (1 - \delta_{\text{geom}}) \tag{11.13} \]

Maximum stretching occurs at intermediate \( \delta_{\text{geom}} \approx 0.3\text{–}0.6 \). For \( \delta_{\text{geom}} \to 0 \) (laminar) or \( \delta_{\text{geom}} \to 1 \) (isotropic), \( S_{\text{eff}} \to 0 \).

11.7 Coarse-Grained Dynamics

Decompose velocity: \( \mathbf{u} = \bar{\mathbf{u}} + \mathbf{u}' \). The Reynolds stress is:

\[ \tau = \langle \mathbf{u}' \otimes \mathbf{u}' \rangle \tag{11.14} \]

From Section 11.0, \( \delta_{\text{geom}} = \langle |\mathbf{u}'_\perp|^2 \rangle / \langle |\mathbf{u}'|^2 \rangle \), so:

\[ \tau \approx (1 - \delta_{\text{geom}}) \langle |\mathbf{u}'|^2 \rangle \hat{\mathbf{u}} \otimes \hat{\mathbf{u}} + \frac{\delta_{\text{geom}}}{2} \langle |\mathbf{u}'|^2 \rangle (I - \hat{\mathbf{u}} \otimes \hat{\mathbf{u}}) \tag{11.15} \]

11.7.2 δ_geom-Weighted Navier–Stokes

Conservation of momentum (Section 6.7) yields:

\[ \frac{\partial \bar{\mathbf{u}}}{\partial t} + (1 - \delta_{\text{geom}}) (\bar{\mathbf{u}} \cdot \nabla) \bar{\mathbf{u}} = -\frac{\nabla p}{\rho} + \nu \nabla^2 \bar{\mathbf{u}} \tag{11.16} \]

Convection is self-regulating: high \( \delta_{\text{geom}} \) weakens nonlinearity, preventing blow-up.

11.7.3 Vorticity Equation

\[ \frac{\partial \boldsymbol{\omega}}{\partial t} + (1 - \delta_{\text{geom}}) [(\boldsymbol{\omega} \cdot \nabla) \bar{\mathbf{u}} - (\bar{\mathbf{u}} \cdot \nabla) \boldsymbol{\omega}] = \nu \nabla^2 \boldsymbol{\omega} \tag{11.17} \]

11.7.4 Enstrophy Inequality

Multiplying (11.17) by \( \boldsymbol{\omega} \) and integrating:

\[ \frac{d}{dt} \int |\boldsymbol{\omega}|^2 dV = 2 \int (1 - \delta_{\text{geom}}) \boldsymbol{\omega} \cdot \mathbf{S} \cdot \boldsymbol{\omega} dV - 2\nu \int |\nabla \boldsymbol{\omega}|^2 dV \tag{11.18} \]

Since \( \boldsymbol{\omega} \cdot \mathbf{S} \cdot \boldsymbol{\omega} \leq S_{\text{max}} |\boldsymbol{\omega}|^2 \), enstrophy decays if:

\[ \langle \delta_{\text{geom}} \rangle > 1 - \frac{\nu \lambda_1}{S_{\text{max}}} \tag{11.19} \]

where \( \lambda_1 \) is the smallest eigenvalue of the Laplacian.

11.8 Turbulence Regimes

Regime \( \delta_{\text{geom}} \) Convection Stretching Behavior
Laminar 0 1 Minimal Stable
Transitional 0.3–0.6 0.4–0.7 Max Peak enstrophy
Fully turbulent 1 0 None Dissipative

11.9 Axiomatic Closure

Phenomenon Substrate Origin Axiom
Measurement Collapse Causal overlap \( \Omega \) → phase synchronization A2, A3, A6, A9
Turbulence Cluster misalignment A3, A6
Temporal Dilation \( \tau_{\text{eff}} = \tau_0 / (1 - \delta_{\text{geom}}) \) A6
Navier-Stokes Momentum conservation (Section 6.7) A2, A3, A9

11.10 Bridge to Section 12 — Gauge Structure

Section 11 provides:

  • Measurement as causal synchronization within light cones
  • Turbulence as geometric damping from misalignment
  • Unified origin of quantum and classical irreversibility

Section 12 derives the microscopic origin of the electromagnetic coupling constant \( \alpha_{\text{EM}} \) from phase coherence in multi-component flow multiplets.

No comments:

Post a Comment