From Discrete to Continuous: How TFP Bridges the Gap

-
From Discrete to Continuous: How TFP Bridges the Gap A blog post explaining how Temporal Flow Physics reveals continuity as emergent from discrete relational processes The False Dichotomy That Has Haunted Physics For decades, physics has been caught in what seems like an irreconcilable tension: quantum mechanics suggests reality is fundamentally discrete and probabilistic, while general relativity describes smooth, continuous spacetime. String theory, loop quantum gravity, and other approaches have tried to resolve this by choosing one side or the other. But what if this isn't actually a choice we need to make? What if continuous spacetime and discrete quantum processes are two perspectives on the same underlying reality? Through my work on Temporal Flow Physics (TFP), I've discovered that continuity doesn't compete with discreteness — it emerges from it . Let me show you how this works, both logically and mathematically. The Key Insight: Continuity as Cohere...
Post a Comment

5. Emergence of Fundamental Constants and Concepts

-

Section 5: Emergence of Fundamental Constants and Concepts

Deriving c, E, m, and Relativistic Structure from Temporal Flow Dynamics with Local Time Asymmetry

5.1 The Speed of Light as an Emergent Local Causal Limit

5.1.1 Discrete Causal Constraint and Local Time Directionality

Each temporal flow element F_i(t) is dimensionless and evolves in discrete steps Δt (units: Time). The local flow rate is defined as:

\( u_i(t) = \frac{F_i(t + \Delta t) - F_i(t)}{\Delta t} \quad \text{(units: 1 / Time)} \)

To maintain causality, the difference in flow rates between neighboring nodes satisfies the inequality only in regions where local discrete time asymmetry emerges. Define the discrete time asymmetry at node i as:

\( A_i(t) = F_i(t + \Delta t) - 2 F_i(t) + F_i(t - \Delta t) \)

Regions with nonzero \( A_i(t) \) correspond to local breaking of time-reversal symmetry and the emergence of a preferred time direction.

In these locally time-asymmetric regions, causality requires:

\( \ell_P \times |u_i(t) - u_j(t)| \leq c \quad \quad (5.1) \)

where
\( \ell_P \) is the Planck length (units: Length),
\( c \) is the emergent local causal speed limit (units: Length / Time).

The units are consistent:
Length × (1 / Time) = Length / Time.

Thus, \( c \) acts as a local causal speed limit, restricting how quickly flow differences (signals) can propagate between nodes.

In regions where \( A_i(t) \approx 0 \) (temporally symmetric substrate), this causal bound is not defined, and flow evolution is effectively bidirectional and symmetric.

5.1.2 Physical Interpretation

The local discrete time asymmetry \( A_i(t) \) controls where and when a preferred causal arrow emerges.

The inequality (5.1) enforces a local discrete light cone, bounding causal influence.

Large gradients in \( u_i \) (flow rates) across neighbors are energetically penalized, stabilizing coherent causal propagation.

5.1.3 Derivation of the Speed Limit

From inequality (5.1),

\( |u_i - u_j| \leq \frac{c}{\ell_P} \)

Since

\( u_i \approx \frac{\Delta F_i}{\Delta t} \)

this implies the fundamental relation

\( c = \frac{\ell_P}{\Delta t_P} \)

where \( \Delta t_P \) is the fundamental discrete time step (Planck time scale).

5.1.4 Action Penalty Term for Flow Rate Gradients

The discrete action \( S[F] \) includes a penalty for flow rate differences:

\( S_{\text{penalty}} = \sum_{\text{neighbors}} \lambda \times C_{KE} \times (u_i - u_j)^2 \times \Delta t \)

where

  • \( \lambda \) is a dimensionless coupling strength
  • \( C_{KE} = m_P \times \ell_P^2 \) (units: Mass × Length²)
  • \( \Delta t \) is the discrete time step

Units check:
\( (\text{Mass} \times \text{Length}^2) \times (1 / \text{Time}^2) \times \text{Time} = \text{Mass} \times \text{Length}^2 / \text{Time} = \text{Energy} \)

This term energetically suppresses violations of the causal speed limit in locally time-asymmetric regions.

5.2 Energy as Local Kinetic Content of Flow

5.2.1 Local Flow Kinetic Energy

At each node \( i \), kinetic energy is:

\( E_i = \frac{1}{2} \times m_P \times \ell_P^2 \times u_i^2 \quad \text{(units: Energy)} \)

5.2.2 Total Energy and Power

\[ E_{\text{total}}(t) = \sum_i E_i(t) \]

\[ \text{Power} = \frac{d E_{\text{total}}}{dt} \]

Energy arises from local flow dynamics and is an emergent quantity anchored in Planck units.

5.3 Mass as Structural Stability of Flow Excitations

5.3.1 Stable Flow Excitations

Massive excitations correspond to stable, localized flow solitons that persist only where local discrete time asymmetry

\( A_i(t) \neq 0 \)

exists, i.e., where causal irreversibility and soliton saturation induce persistent oscillatory coherence.

5.3.2 Mass as Energy Gap

Mass is defined as the energy cost to disrupt a coherent soliton or excitation:

\( M_{\text{excitation}} = E_{\text{disrupted}} - E_{\text{stable}} \quad (\geq 0) \)

5.3.3 Effective Inertial Mass

The effective mass is:

\( m_{\text{eff}} = \frac{\eta(A_i)}{c^2} \times M_{\text{excitation}} \)

where

  • \( \eta(A_i) \) is a dimensionless stability factor dependent on local discrete time asymmetry and soliton coherence
  • \( c^2 \) converts energy units to mass units

Mass thus emerges statistically and locally, not as a universal constant, reflecting local network saturation and asymmetry.

5.3.4 Why This Matters

Mass depends on local soliton coherence and directional flow saturation.
Regions with low or zero \( A_i(t) \) do not sustain stable massive excitations.

5.4 Emergence of \( E = m c^2 \) and Relativistic Structure

5.4.1 Mass-Energy Equivalence

In locally time-asymmetric, soliton-saturated regions, the familiar relation arises:

\( E_{\text{excitation}} = m_{\text{eff}} \times c^2 \)

without being postulated a priori.

5.4.2 Structural Origin

Energy (\( E \)), mass (\( m \)), and causal speed (\( c \)) all emerge statistically from soliton-saturated, temporally neutral flow networks with local discrete time asymmetry \( A_i(t) \neq 0 \).

Lorentz symmetry is not fundamental but emerges approximately when causal coherence becomes isotropic and dimensionally consistent over localized patches.

5.4.3 Relativistic Behavior from Flow

Lorentz-like symmetry arises in coarse-grained patches with stable, isotropic soliton coherence.
Relativistic geodesics correspond to trajectories within these saturated causal regions.
Where coherence or local asymmetry breaks down, deviations from relativity, curvature, or anisotropy emerge.

5.5 Connection to Spatial Emergence

5.5.1 Spatial Distance from Flow Amplitudes

Spatial distance between nodes is given by relational flow misalignment:

\( |x_i - x_j| = \ell_P \times |F_i - F_j| \)

consistent with Section 3’s emergence of geometry from flow amplitude differences.

5.5.2 Flow Rate Constraints Ensure Local Causality

The causal bound

\( |u_i - u_j| \leq \frac{c}{\ell_P} \)

applies only where local discrete time asymmetry \( A_i(t) \neq 0 \), ensuring a local light-cone causal structure.
Regions with \( A_i(t) \approx 0 \) exhibit temporally symmetric flow without a preferred causal direction.

5.5.3 Energy–Momentum–Space Unification

Quantity Emergence Mechanism
Energy Local flow kinetics
Momentum Directional flow differences
Mass Soliton coherence and excitation stability
Distance Flow amplitude misalignment
Curvature Aggregated soliton complexity and directional bias

5.6 Structural vs. Mathematical Emergence

5.6.1 Discreteness is Fundamental

The discrete time step \( \Delta t \) and length scale \( \ell_P \) are physical scales, not infinitesimal limits.
Local discrete time asymmetry \( A_i(t) \) is a fundamental condition for causal directionality.
All equations are defined on discrete substrate networks; continuum fields arise as coarse-grained approximations.

5.6.2 Implications

Special relativity emerges only in causally saturated, locally time-asymmetric patches.
Constants like \( c \) and \( m_{\text{eff}} \) are local, emergent parameters depending on soliton coherence and flow saturation.
Flow—not spacetime—is the fundamental substrate of reality.

5.7 Testable Predictions

5.7.1 Modified Dispersion Relations

Energy-momentum relations include corrections due to discrete flow structure:

\( E^2 \approx (p c)^2 + (m c^2)^2 + \delta E^2_{\text{discrete}} \)

where \( \delta E^2_{\text{discrete}} \) encodes Planck-scale discreteness and coherence limits.

5.7.2 Possible Local Causal Violations

Causal speed \( c \) may fluctuate or be violated in regions with soliton fragmentation, coherence collapse, or saturation failure (where \( A_i(t) \to 0 \)).
These effects may be observable in black hole interiors, early universe physics, or high-energy scattering.

5.7.3 Mass Stability Signatures

Instability or decay of mass due to soliton failure or loss of local time asymmetry may produce observable anomalies in particle lifetimes or collider experiment outcomes.

5.8 Forward Connections

  • Section 3: Spatial distance and coherence from bidirectional flow
  • Section 4: Solitons and phase-locked mass excitations dependent on local time asymmetry
  • Section 6: Gauge fields and force mediation via flow misalignment
  • Sections 10–11: Quantum behavior from soliton coherence
  • Section 13: Renormalization and soliton-based scale dynamics

Summary of Key Constants and Variables (Updated)

Symbol Meaning Units Notes
\( F_i(t) \) Temporal flow scalar Dimensionless Fundamental flow variable
\( u_i(t) \) Local flow rate 1 / Time Discrete time derivative
\( \ell_P \) Planck length Length Fundamental length scale
\( \Delta t \) Discrete time step Time Fundamental time scale
\( A_i(t) \) Local discrete time asymmetry Dimensionless Measures local time directionality
\( c \) Emergent causal speed limit Length / Time Local speed of causal propagation
\( m_P \) Planck mass Mass Anchors energy and mass scale
\( C_{KE} \) Kinetic scaling constant Mass × Length² \( m_P \times \ell_P^2 \)
\( \eta(A_i) \) Stability coefficient Dimensionless Depends on local time asymmetry
\( M_{\text{exc}} \) Excitation energy gap Energy Flow structure deformation cost
\( m_{\text{eff}} \) Emergent inertial mass Mass From local coherence and \( E=mc^2 \)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A build up of time

-
 Building up time. You could think of time as physical, or much more basic such as meta dynamics of what is physical. Sense you are working with a single dimension that builds up dimensons through interations.  c = j⋅r_i + 2⋅(Δr_i / Δj)⋅r_i Where: c is the result  j is flow (a positive or negitive value) r_i represents a rate (which is a conglomerate of flows) Δr_i and Δj represent changes in rate and flow, respectively given the "speed" of light consider our dimensions are D = fa + fb A dimension (D) emerges as the ratio of two interacting flows (fa and fb). This suggests that dimensions are not absolute, but relative measures arising from the interaction of more fundamental entities, flows. Lets go further and say space emerging from time. A metric for this space as: ds² = Σ(Ri + fi)² * dxi² Where i runs over all dimensions. Include our speed of light in the metric ds² = c² * [dt² - (1/c²) * Σ(ri² * dx0²)] Events with ds² > 0 are timelike separated, ds² = 0 are light...
Read more

1. First Principles of Temporal Flow Physics

-
Section 1: First Principles of Temporal Flow Physics (TFP) Section 1: First Principles of Temporal Flow Physics (TFP) Foundational Axioms for an Emergent Framework of Space, Matter, and Force By John Gavel Abstract Temporal Flow Physics (TFP) is a first-principles theoretical framework proposing that all physical structures—space, particles, forces, and energy—emerge from a discrete network of one-dimensional temporal flows. These flows evolve causally at a fundamental time scale, without presupposing any background space or fields. This Section defines six foundational principles that form the axiomatic basis of TFP. Each principle addresses a key aspect of physical reality—dimensionality, geometry, quantization, interaction, and symmetry—and connects directly to formal derivations in later Sections. The framework offers a unified approach that incorporates time asymmetry, CPT violation, and dimensional emergence from first principles. 1. Introduction ...
Read more

Temporal Physics: A New Framework

-
Temporal Physics: A New Framework Table of Contents 1. [Fundamental Framework](#1-fundamental-framework) 2. [Emergence of Space](#2-emergence-of-space) 3. [Fields and Force Dynamics](#3-fields-and-force-dynamics) 4. [Particle Properties](#4-particle-properties) 5. [Quantum Entanglement](#5-quantum-entanglement) 6. [Quantum-Classical Transition](#6-quantum-classical-transition) 7. [Observable Phenomena](#7-observable-phenomena) 8. [Experimental Implications](#8-experimental-implications)  1. Fundamental Framework Time as the Fundamental Entity - Traditional physics treats space as primary; we invert this paradigm. - Core Assertion : Time flows generate spatial dimensions, implying that space is a byproduct of temporal interactions. - The interplay of temporal flows shapes all physical phenomena, creating a dynamic framework that transcends classical interpretations.  Core Principles 1. Time is Primary, Space is Emergent : Space does not exist independently but arises from the c...
Read more