Thoughts on temporal dynamics.

 The "fundamental flow" is the primary temporal dynamic. I think of this as a positive or negitive value. Positive sugesting right movement or corilation and negitive left movement or corilation. The fundamental flow serves as the underlying cause for space-time continuity. Essentially all flows have this property and distinguish each other vai this dynamic.

I consdier the acumulation as part of the dynamic flow. Accumulation of flows could promote order or disorder given the corilation of flows and consdiering if the system is symmetric or asymmetric. The problem comes in with limits like the speed of light. Entorpy can not surevive limit, hence why it depends on the systems symmetric or asymmetric manifestation/segmentation based on the limits. Does this make sense?

 Spatial dimensions are likely emergent properties resulting from temporal flows interacting in a consistent manner. The idea that every point in space can be broken down into interactions of temporal flows (as per my "three-point" rule) suggests that dimensions themselves are relational rather than intrinsic. The more interactions between flows, the more spatial structure emerges. Space could be an abstraction that emerges from the complex interactions of these time flows.

Information conveyance in my model could be linked to the rate at which temporal flows interact and exchange data. Conveyance is more directly tied to the fundamental temporal interactions themselves. Information transfer may be limited by the speed of light, suggesting that information exchange between temporal flows is bound by the fundamental flow's rate. This could explain how systems maintain causality and coherence while still interacting across different regions of space-time.

Entangled particles could be part of the same flow. That is as we break down the rates into planck scales we would see synchronized temporal interactions. Their non-local correlations could be explained as a result of their shared history in the fundamental temporal flow. Since space emerges from time in my model, the distance between entangled particles may not be as relevant as the continuity of their temporal interactions. Superposition might be framed as different potential states existing within the same or overlapping temporal flows. The act of measurement then collapses these possibilities by aligning the observer’s flow with the state being measured. Temporal waves can coalesce into particles depending on the situation could explain the duality seen in quantum mechanics. At smaller scales, where space hasn’t fully "emerged" from time, the system behaves more wave-like, and as interactions accumulate (or the flows coalesce), particles emerge as stable configurations of these waves.