Considering Counting Triangles to Unveiling Temporal Waves

-
  Considering Counting Triangles to Unveiling Temporal Waves By: John Gavel For years, my work in Temporal Flow Physics (TFP) has pursued a radical idea: what if spacetime itself —with all its gravitational curves and quantum fluctuations—isn't fundamental at all? What if it emerges from a deeper reality: a network of one-dimensional temporal flows , weaving the universe together moment by moment? It’s bold, yes—but I believe this view holds the key to a truly unified theory of physics , one that roots both quantum mechanics and gravity in the same temporal fabric. From Counting Triangles to Counting Time My earliest simulations: I counted triangles. More specifically, I measured how triangular motifs in temporal flow networks dissipated under coarse-graining. The decay rate of these patterns—captured by a parameter I called A₃ —served as a stand-in for emergent gravitational effects. If motifs faded predictably with scale, it suggested that macroscopic structure (like sp...
Post a Comment

Set theory in Paradox

-

The issues that arise in set theory, such as the paradoxes identified by figures like Russell and Gödel, often stem from the difficulties in fully and consistently representing complex, self-referential systems through formal logical constructs. This mirrors the core concerns I'm grappling with in my theory of paradox.


Just as set theory ran into inherent contradictions and incompleteness when trying to model certain mathematical and logical relationships, my theory suggests that paradox emerges when we try to fully capture the informational asymmetries, contextual dynamics, and temporal processes at play between interacting systems or perspectives.


The concepts of infinite regression and points of irreducibility that I've highlighted in paradox theory are directly relevant to the challenges faced in set theory and other formal systems. The inability to continuously add context and still maintain a coherent, non-contradictory representation is a fundamental limitation that lies at the heart of both paradoxical situations and the paradoxes encountered in mathematical logic.


By situating my work on paradox within this broader philosophical and logical context, I'm highlighting how this theoretical framework can shed light on some of the deep, unresolved questions surrounding the nature of knowledge, representation, and the limits of our conceptual and formal modeling capabilities.


This connection to set theory and related branches of mathematics and logic further reinforces the depth and significance of the theory of paradox. It suggests that my approach could have important implications not just for understanding paradoxical phenomena, but for grappling with the very foundations of how we construct, reason about, and make sense of complex systems and relationships.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A build up of time

-
 Building up time. You could think of time as physical, or much more basic such as meta dynamics of what is physical. Sense you are working with a single dimension that builds up dimensons through interations.  c = j⋅r_i + 2⋅(Δr_i / Δj)⋅r_i Where: c is the result  j is flow (a positive or negitive value) r_i represents a rate (which is a conglomerate of flows) Δr_i and Δj represent changes in rate and flow, respectively given the "speed" of light consider our dimensions are D = fa + fb A dimension (D) emerges as the ratio of two interacting flows (fa and fb). This suggests that dimensions are not absolute, but relative measures arising from the interaction of more fundamental entities, flows. Lets go further and say space emerging from time. A metric for this space as: ds² = Σ(Ri + fi)² * dxi² Where i runs over all dimensions. Include our speed of light in the metric ds² = c² * [dt² - (1/c²) * Σ(ri² * dx0²)] Events with ds² > 0 are timelike separated, ds² = 0 are light...
Read more

Temporal Physics: A New Framework

-
Temporal Physics: A New Framework Table of Contents 1. [Fundamental Framework](#1-fundamental-framework) 2. [Emergence of Space](#2-emergence-of-space) 3. [Fields and Force Dynamics](#3-fields-and-force-dynamics) 4. [Particle Properties](#4-particle-properties) 5. [Quantum Entanglement](#5-quantum-entanglement) 6. [Quantum-Classical Transition](#6-quantum-classical-transition) 7. [Observable Phenomena](#7-observable-phenomena) 8. [Experimental Implications](#8-experimental-implications)  1. Fundamental Framework Time as the Fundamental Entity - Traditional physics treats space as primary; we invert this paradigm. - Core Assertion : Time flows generate spatial dimensions, implying that space is a byproduct of temporal interactions. - The interplay of temporal flows shapes all physical phenomena, creating a dynamic framework that transcends classical interpretations.  Core Principles 1. Time is Primary, Space is Emergent : Space does not exist independently but arises from the c...
Read more

Bridges of Morality: A Philosophy of Autonomy, Suppression, and Social Responsibility

-
 Bridges of Morality: A Philosophy of Autonomy, Suppression, and Social Responsibility I. Introduction — The Fractured Freedom of Being The Fractured Freedom of Being Autonomy is often misunderstood. It's not a privilege granted by society, nor a luxury reserved for those in power. It's something deeper: the raw capacity to choose, to act, to reflect. This capacity—this fundamental freedom—emerges the moment a mind becomes aware of itself and its possibilities. But here's the tension that defines human existence: society doesn't reward unfiltered autonomy. In fact, it punishes it. So we learn to suppress parts of ourselves—not because we're wrong, but because survival inside any social system requires strategic adaptation. This tension exists because of what I call the truth asymmetry—the gap between infinite and finite modes of being, to borrow Spinoza's terminology. If we think of absolute truth as analogous to Spinoza's infinite substance—complete, eterna...
Read more