Considering Counting Triangles to Unveiling Temporal Waves

-
  Considering Counting Triangles to Unveiling Temporal Waves By: John Gavel For years, my work in Temporal Flow Physics (TFP) has pursued a radical idea: what if spacetime itself —with all its gravitational curves and quantum fluctuations—isn't fundamental at all? What if it emerges from a deeper reality: a network of one-dimensional temporal flows , weaving the universe together moment by moment? It’s bold, yes—but I believe this view holds the key to a truly unified theory of physics , one that roots both quantum mechanics and gravity in the same temporal fabric. From Counting Triangles to Counting Time My earliest simulations: I counted triangles. More specifically, I measured how triangular motifs in temporal flow networks dissipated under coarse-graining. The decay rate of these patterns—captured by a parameter I called A₃ —served as a stand-in for emergent gravitational effects. If motifs faded predictably with scale, it suggested that macroscopic structure (like sp...
Post a Comment

Revision of flow

-

 One recent revision to my model of Temporal Physics is the flow of time. In quantifying it I have determined that flow is the difference between two points in time. This difference might be positive or negative. This then dictates the direction of flow in time.

The abstract nature of an absolute point in time is curious. In my model I use rate to indicate how many points are in continuous flow. But I also look at rare as that system of sets of flows. In this we could consider three positive flows in three points in time as a Rate with a value of three.  This is slightly recursive because that Rate of three becomes a point in time with positive flow. We could say that the conglomerate of flows gives it amplitude. Where from that Rate's point the influence extends out three points. However that point with neighboring points could then be considered a rate with flow and the amplitude the difference between all the flows encompassed. 

Now how do rates permanent, they simply exchange flow for flow. Where a rate has met a maximum number of flows in congenius then exchange is minimal, while you could say the rest are reflected. This gives rise to particle physics. 

Going back to the recursion of the underlining rate containing flows. How do we know a flow doesn't contain substantial flows and is a rare in and of itself? I think this is where the speed of light signals our limitations to how much time can permeate. We see this in relativity, where mass increases toward the speed of light, time slows. Time is slowing because flows have fewer chances to exchange it's difference to or with. In this it is a bandwidth issue. That difference being a positive or negative value. 

As always space emerges from time as a set of rates in comparison. Those sets tend to exchange in or with neighboring sets, if you quantify this it's the reason for three dimensions. It's a type of limiting exchange from left to right in a single time dimension. So one might ask how are distances relevant in a single dimension? Because they don't have a choice but to exchange with it's immediate neighbors in times limited dimension. Limited as in it's only single dimensional, laterally right of left time's points can be infinite. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A build up of time

-
 Building up time. You could think of time as physical, or much more basic such as meta dynamics of what is physical. Sense you are working with a single dimension that builds up dimensons through interations.  c = j⋅r_i + 2⋅(Δr_i / Δj)⋅r_i Where: c is the result  j is flow (a positive or negitive value) r_i represents a rate (which is a conglomerate of flows) Δr_i and Δj represent changes in rate and flow, respectively given the "speed" of light consider our dimensions are D = fa + fb A dimension (D) emerges as the ratio of two interacting flows (fa and fb). This suggests that dimensions are not absolute, but relative measures arising from the interaction of more fundamental entities, flows. Lets go further and say space emerging from time. A metric for this space as: ds² = Σ(Ri + fi)² * dxi² Where i runs over all dimensions. Include our speed of light in the metric ds² = c² * [dt² - (1/c²) * Σ(ri² * dx0²)] Events with ds² > 0 are timelike separated, ds² = 0 are light...
Read more

Temporal Physics: A New Framework

-
Temporal Physics: A New Framework Table of Contents 1. [Fundamental Framework](#1-fundamental-framework) 2. [Emergence of Space](#2-emergence-of-space) 3. [Fields and Force Dynamics](#3-fields-and-force-dynamics) 4. [Particle Properties](#4-particle-properties) 5. [Quantum Entanglement](#5-quantum-entanglement) 6. [Quantum-Classical Transition](#6-quantum-classical-transition) 7. [Observable Phenomena](#7-observable-phenomena) 8. [Experimental Implications](#8-experimental-implications)  1. Fundamental Framework Time as the Fundamental Entity - Traditional physics treats space as primary; we invert this paradigm. - Core Assertion : Time flows generate spatial dimensions, implying that space is a byproduct of temporal interactions. - The interplay of temporal flows shapes all physical phenomena, creating a dynamic framework that transcends classical interpretations.  Core Principles 1. Time is Primary, Space is Emergent : Space does not exist independently but arises from the c...
Read more

Bridges of Morality: A Philosophy of Autonomy, Suppression, and Social Responsibility

-
 Bridges of Morality: A Philosophy of Autonomy, Suppression, and Social Responsibility I. Introduction — The Fractured Freedom of Being The Fractured Freedom of Being Autonomy is often misunderstood. It's not a privilege granted by society, nor a luxury reserved for those in power. It's something deeper: the raw capacity to choose, to act, to reflect. This capacity—this fundamental freedom—emerges the moment a mind becomes aware of itself and its possibilities. But here's the tension that defines human existence: society doesn't reward unfiltered autonomy. In fact, it punishes it. So we learn to suppress parts of ourselves—not because we're wrong, but because survival inside any social system requires strategic adaptation. This tension exists because of what I call the truth asymmetry—the gap between infinite and finite modes of being, to borrow Spinoza's terminology. If we think of absolute truth as analogous to Spinoza's infinite substance—complete, eterna...
Read more